Posted in

Optimization of 3D Models for Video Games and Virtual Reality

Optimization of 3D Models
Some links in this publication are affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend products that we think you will find useful. See my disclosure to learn more.

When we are creating 3D models for video games or virtual reality, we face a fascinating challenge: making our creations look spectacular while running smoothly on resource-constrained hardware. It is not an easy task, but mastering these optimization techniques makes the difference between an immersive and smooth experience or a game that drags at low frame rates.

Optimization of 3D models is not just a final technical phase; it’s a mindset we must adopt from the first moment we start designing. I’ve seen many projects fail because they left optimization as “something to figure out later,” only to discover that it was too late to fundamentally restructure their assets.

Why is this so crucial? Simple: video games and virtual reality demand that our models be rendered in real time, often at 60, 90 or even 120 frames per second. Every millisecond counts, and every extra polygon comes at a cost.

Fundamentals of 3D optimization

Before diving into the advanced techniques of optimization of 3D models, we need to understand the basic components we work with.

Every 3D model is made up of polygons (usually triangles), which in turn are made up of vertices connected by edges. The more polygons a model has, the more detailed it can be, but it also requires more processing power to render.

The textures are images that are applied over these polygons to give them color, detail, depth and other visual properties. They take up video memory (VRAM) and their size and quantity significantly affect performance.

The big challenge is always to find the perfect balance: when to reduce polygons without sacrificing visual quality? What texture resolution is appropriate for each element? The answers vary by platform and context. A main character in a PC game may have 50,000 polygons, while that same character in a mobile game might need to run at just 5,000.

Geometry optimization techniques

Polygon reduction (decimation)

I have used this technique countless times to transform detailed models into lighter versions. It consists of strategically reducing the number of polygons while maintaining the silhouette and the most important details.

Programs like Blender, Maya or ZBrush offer decimation tools that can automatically reduce the polygon count, but I always check the results manually. Automatic reductions can eliminate critical details or create problematic topologies.

Level of Detail (LOD)

This is one of my favorite techniques. It consists of creating multiple versions of the same model with different levels of detail. When the player is close, he sees the detailed version; as he moves away, the game loads increasingly simplified versions.

For example, a tree, might have 15,000 polygons when you are standing next to it, 5,000 polygons in the middle distance, and just 500 when you view it from afar. The change between versions must be subtle so as not to distract the player.

Topology optimization

The way we structure the polygons in a model matters as much as their quantity. A good topology follows the natural flow of the geometry and concentrates details where they are most needed.

For characters, I make sure that areas that deform during animation (such as joints) have enough polygons to move naturally. For static objects, I simplify flat areas and keep details only where they provide real visual value.

Texture optimization

Formats and compression

Choosing the right format can drastically reduce the size of textures without noticeable loss of quality. For most cases, I use compressed formats such as BC7/DXT5 for desktop platforms and ASTC for mobile devices.

One tip I always give: textures need not be square or have dimensions in powers of 2 (such as 1024×1024) on all modern platforms, but keeping these conventions usually optimizes memory usage.

Efficient UV maps

UV maps define how a 2D texture is projected onto a 3D model. Optimizing them is crucial, and I spend considerable time on this process that many artists underestimate.

I try to maximize the space used in my UV maps by allocating more resolution to visible and important areas – why waste precious pixels on the bottom of a shoe that no one will see?

Texture atlases

Instead of using multiple small textures, I combine several textures into a single “atlas”. This drastically reduces GPU calls and improves performance, especially in scenes with many similar objects such as vegetation or building elements.

Optimization for performance

Culling techniques

Culling consists of not rendering what does not need to be seen. It seems obvious, but its correct implementation can double the performance of a game.

Occlusion culling avoids rendering objects that are hidden by other elements. Frustum culling ignores objects outside the camera’s field of view. Every polygon that we don’t need to draw is processing power that we can use to improve other visual aspects.

Batching and instancing

When I have many identical or similar objects (like trees in a forest), I use instancing to render them all with a single call to the GPU. This technique allows to populate huge sceneries with thousands of elements without sacrificing performance.

Specific Considerations for Virtual Reality

VR imposes unique challenges. We need to maintain at least a constant 90 FPS to avoid motion sickness, and we need to render everything twice (once for each eye).

When designing for VR, I prioritize optimization of 3D models even more than for traditional video games. Each scene must be meticulously optimized, and all objects must follow a strict polygon and texture budget.

One specific technique I implement is fixed foveated rendering, which renders the center of the vision in greater detail and reduces the quality in the periphery, mimicking natural human vision.

Tools and software

I don’t limit myself to one program. I use:

  • Blender for modeling and polygon reduction.
  • Substance Painter for efficient texturing
  • Unity and Unreal Engine for implementation and final optimization
  • RapidCompact for automatic optimization of complex models.

Each tool has its strengths, and combining them properly enhances our workflow.

Recommended workflow

Based on my experience, this is the process that has given me the best results:

  1. plan with optimization in mind from the initial concept 2.
  2. Establish clear polygon and texture budgets for each element.
  3. Create rapid prototypes for early performance testing
  4. Implement LODs from the beginning
  5. Iterate constantly, measuring the impact on performance.

Case Studies

Half-Life: Alyx

This VR game achieves an astonishing level of detail while maintaining flawless performance. Its developers used advanced LOD techniques and meticulous memory management.

One particular technique I admire is how they only load high-resolution detail for objects the player interacts with directly, while maintaining simpler versions for the rest of the environment.

The Last of Us Part II

While not a VR game, its optimization of 3D assets is superb. Naughty Dog implemented an asset streaming system that loads and unloads models and textures as needed, allowing for an incredible level of detail without compromising performance.

Conclusion and recommendations

Optimization of 3D models is not just a technical skill; it is an art that requires understanding both hardware limitations and users’ visual expectations.

My final piece of advice: don’t leave optimization for last. Incorporate it as an integral part of your creative process from day one, and your projects will be much stronger.

The key to success is finding that sweet spot where technical performance and visual quality are perfectly balanced. When you find it, you will have mastered one of the most challenging and rewarding aspects of 3D development.